This is Professor Broad’s evaluation of the semester’s coursework completed by:
(student’s name) ________________________________________
Date of evaluation: _________________________
To help you learn and improve your work, I have already commented substantially on your projects during the semester. In this summary evaluation I will provide only brief comments--if any--on your work. My job at this point is to judge your work against the standards we have developed within our course and that I have developed during my years teaching these courses.
At this time, I am looking mainly for two things: changes in your work since I last saw it (e.g., all evidence of your writing process on major project[s], new journal entries) and a sense of how your work looks all collected in your portfolio and considered as a final and whole product. I will read the contents of your portfolio and judge each of the major elements as falling into one of five categories of quality. I use a number to represent each category of judgment: 4 = "Excellent, Outstanding"; 3 = "Good, Impressive"; 2 = "Adequate, Satisfactory"; 1 = "Poor, Unsatisfactory"; 0 (zero) = "No Credit." (Note also the correspondence between these numbers and the letter grades listed below.)
The final grade I assign to your work in the course records my synthesis of the judgments I make concerning the major elements of your work in the course. Here is the meaning that each letter grade carries for me:
|
Process
(50%)
|
Product
(50%)
|
Combined
Grade (process
& product) |
Notes
|
|
Major Research |
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical Experiences Report
|
|
|
||
|
Other
Teaching-Related Texts
|
|
|
||
|
Response
Journal |
|
|
||
|
Class
Participation Including attendance, preparation, listening, speaking, Teaching Reports, and Practice Teaching |
|
|
||
|
Other
Portfolio Materials Including
Preface/Introduction, Table of Contents, process documentation, responses to and support of
others’ work, and organization of portfolio (use dividers!) |
|
|
||
Grade for the course: ________